Long before he became one of Hollywood's most recognizable leading men, Tom Cruise had starred in Top Gun, a film that would go on to become one of the biggest breakout movies of the 1980s. Not only would it gross several times its production budget during its original theatrical run, but it would also produce a successful soundtrack album that would earn it an Academy Award for Best Original Song. Despite all that success, it would take three and a half decades before we finally got a sequel in the form of Top Gun: Maverick. Now that the new film is out in theaters, I figured I would share my thoughts on whether or not it was worth the wait.
The film takes place 36
years after the original, with Captain Pete Mitchell, aka Maverick (Tom
Cruise), still working as a naval pilot. Unlike most of his peers, he
has refused to advance within the Navy's ranks, just so he can continue flying. But after a reckless maneuver during a test flight causes his
superiors to ground him indefinitely, he is given a lifeline by an old
friend (Val Kilmer). He is to return to TOPGUN, a school where the very best naval
aviators get trained. But not as a student, but rather as an instructor
for a new batch of hotshot pilots, as they prepare for the most
dangerous mission of their collective careers.
On
the surface, a movie like Top Gun: Maverick might look like yet another
attempt by a Hollywood studio to revive an old intellectual property
using nostalgia and star power. But to dismiss it as such would be doing
a disservice to the amount of love and care that has gone into crafting
the film. Director Joseph Kosinski has already shown that he has a keen
eye for striking visuals through films like Tron: Legacy and Oblivion,
and the same vision is on full display in his latest film. The whole
thing was filmed in 6K IMAX with over 800 hours of aerial photography
captured. The result is some of the most breathtaking
visuals to be shown at the cinemas all year and a movie that simply begs
to be seen on the biggest screen possible.
All
those beautiful shots wouldn't mean anything if the film itself didn't
have a decent enough story holding everything together, or if that story
didn't center around a cast of relatable characters. Thankfully, the
movie has both those areas covered with a solid script that hits all the
required story beats as it builds up to an intense climax. Tom Cruise
also gives one of his better performances while his co-stars all get to
shine in their own ways. The fact that a lot of the film was filmed
inside the cockpits of actual fighter jets thousands of feet in the air
lends those performances a believability that can't be replicated on a
green screen, and the film is better for it.
If
there's one aspect of the movie that I could single out for criticism
then that would have to be just how heavily it leans into the nostalgia
factor. The film practically opens with a shot-for-shot reenactment of
the first film's title sequence. It also has a number of callbacks sprinkled
throughout its runtime. These include everything from Miles Teller's
Rooster rocking the same mustache as Goose, as well as an overreliance
on flashbacks to help fill in the gaps of its story. But it is hard to
truly fault the movie for any of this, not when everything else is handled so
well.
Top Gun:
Maverick is another rare sequel that manages to improve upon its
predecessor in every conceivable way. It joins the ranks of Blade Runner 2049 and Mad Max: Fury Road to serve as shining examples of how old
franchises can be updated for a modern-day audience. While its success
is only going to open the floodgates for even more 80s films to be
revived or rebooted in the months and years to come, I am still glad that we got this one and that it turned out as well as it did.